Maria Elena Hernandez
  • Home
  • Reflection Letter
  • Matrix
  • Courses Taken
    • EDFR 6300 Project
    • EDTC 6320 Projects
    • EDTC 6321 Projects
    • EDTC 6323 Projects
    • EDTC 6325 Projects
    • EDTC 6332 Projects
    • EDTC 6341 Projects
    • EDTC 6351 Projects
    • EDTC 6358 Projects
    • EDFR 6302 Projects
  • Leadership
  • Contact Me
  • Profile
  • Earlier Projects

Your Name

EDTC 6320: Instructional Technology

Project title

Project Description:

Vestibulum vel odio eget metus faucibus ullamcorper. Proin sodales urna quis velit. Mauris eros diam, egestas eu, consectetuer nec, semper sit amet, eros. Fusce ac libero. Aliquam sapien. Aliquam erat volutpat. Cras varius orci sed pede. Fusce eleifend tincidunt odio. Aenean magna. Duis sed leo et mi fermentum viverra. Phasellus nisi turpi, adipiscing sed, adipiscing placerat, convallis ac, sem. Aenean at turpis in nisi pulvinar ullamcorper. Ut sed nib.

Responsibilities Met:

Responsibility 1: Leadership and Professional Development. The candidate will demonstrate leadership and continued improvement of professional practice that requires critical inquiry, professional development, and reflective practice (e.g., membership in professional organizations, submission of a paper for publication, attendance at a local, state, regional, or national conferences). The candidate demonstrates knowledge of past, present and future trends in instructional technologies.

Performance Indicators Justification

1.1 Attends minimum of one regional, state or national conference that directly supports professional growth in instructional technologies.

1.2 Joins a minimum of one professional organization.

1.3 Submits a 3000-word formal paper (in APA format) that describes past, present and future trends in instructional technologies and/or ISD.

1.1 Vestibulum vel odio eget metus faucibus ullamcorper. Proin sodales urna quis velit. Mauris eros diam, egestas eu, consectetuer nec, semper sit amet, eros. Fusce ac libero. Aliquam sapien. Aliquam erat volutpat. Cras varius orci sed pede. Fusce eleifend tincidunt odio. Aenean magna. Duis sed leo et mi fermentum viverra. Phasellus nisi turpi, adipiscing sed, adipiscing placerat, convallis. Ut sed nib.

1.2 Vestibulum vel odio eget metus faucibus ullamcorper. Proin sodales urna quis velit. Mauris eros diam, egestas eu, consectetuer nec, semper sit amet, eros. Fusce ac libero.

1.3 Duis sed leo et mi fermentum viverra. Phasellus nisi turpi, adipiscing sed, adipiscing placerat, convallis ac, sem. Aenean at turpis in nisi pulvinar ullamcorper. Ut sed nib.

Responsibility 2: Design. The candidate will design instruction (or human performance strategies) to meet the needs of learners. Design documents and projects must show evidence of analysis of problem situation, awareness of unique characteristics of intended audience and implications for instruction, selection and implementation instructional strategies consistent with analysis of the learning situation and intended learners, selection and justification of appropriate medias, and evidence of both formative and summative evaluation strategies.

Performance Indicators Justification

Responsibility 3: Development, Utilization and Management. The candidate will develop, utilize and manage a variety of media and instructional technologies to deliver instruction to students.

Performance Indicators Justification

Responsibility 4: Evaluation. The candidate uses incisive and relevant assessment and evaluation techniques (e.g., product or project which uses formative and/or summative evaluations). Candidate demonstrates the ability to evaluate quality of instructional materials and instructional systems using appropriate methodologies. Candidate also demonstrates the ability to use formative and summative assessment methodologies to ascertain the effectiveness of instruction in meeting instructional goals.

Performance Indicators Justification

Responsibility5: Research. The candidate collects, evaluates, and synthesizes research from a variety of appropriate sources in order to support decision-making in design, development, implementation and evaluation of instructional systems.

Performance Indicators Justification

Responsibility 6: Collaboration. The candidate demonstrates the ability to form electronic teams in order to identify and solve problems and opportunities in the field of instructional technology. The candidate demonstrates effective team building skills in a distributed collaboration environment, and demonstrates how candidate's own students or colleagues can take advantage of electronic collaboration for distributed team building.

Performance Indicators Justification

Modifications Made

Vestibulum vel odio eget metus faucibus ullamcorper. Proin sodales urna quis velit. Mauris eros diam, egestas eu, consectetuer nec, semper sit amet, eros. Fusce ac libero. Aliquam sapien. Aliquam erat volutpat. Cras varius orci sed pede. Fusce eleifend tincidunt odio. Aenean magna. Duis sed leo et mi fermentum viverra. Phasellus nisi turpi, adipiscing sed, adipiscing placerat, convallis ac, sem. Aenean at turpis in nisi pulvinar ullamcorper. Ut sed nib.

edtc 6320 artifact report
EDTC 6321:edtc6321_artifactreport_me_hernandez.pdf
EDTC 6323:edtc6323_artifactreport_mariae_hernandez.pdf
EDTC 6325:edtc6325_artifactreport_mariae_hernandez.pdf
EDTC 6332: Educational Technology Practicum
EDTC REVISED SM IU4

  • Home
  • Reflection Letter
  • Matrix
  • Courses Taken
    • EDFR 6300 Project
    • EDTC 6320 Projects
    • EDTC 6321 Projects
    • EDTC 6323 Projects
    • EDTC 6325 Projects
    • EDTC 6332 Projects
    • EDTC 6341 Projects
    • EDTC 6351 Projects
    • EDTC 6358 Projects
    • EDFR 6302 Projects
  • Leadership
  • Contact Me
  • Profile
  • Earlier Projects